ESA
Newsletter December 2000:
ESA Newsletter:
December 2000
ICE 2000
The ICE 2000
meeting was completed very successfully. We had a very good attendance,
with 3300 registrants from 75 different countries. The 215 oral
presentations represented 21 different countries. The meeting progressed
very smoothly due to the excellent organisational skills of ICMS
Australasia. The scientific content was highly regarded. Various
members of the Local Organising Committee and myself have received
numerous positive comments on the excellence of the scientific content
of the meeting. The availability of lunches in the same area as
the poster presentations and the exhibitors' stands led to a very
pleasant and congenial atmosphere, while the close outdoor and pleasant
setting of Darling Harbour was much appreciated.
We are still
in the process of finalising all the costs from the meeting. It
is anticipated that there will be a small profit returned to the
Endocrine Society of Australia.
I would personally
like to acknowledge the outstanding work of Rob Baxter, David Handelsman,
Christine Clarke, Rebecca Mason and Chris Cowell, as well as the
invaluable support and efforts of Ray Rodgers and Duncan Topliss
throughout this process. I would like to think that, and I am encouraged
in this by the comments I have received, it was an outstanding ICE
meeting and one that will be hard to beat in the future.
John Eisman,
Chair, ICE 2000
Local Organising Committee
Media Coverage at ICE 2000
For the first
time ESA engaged a professional media group to help promote media
coverage at ICE 2000. Council considered the request from the local
organizing committee for this, and felt there were two strong reasons
why we should engage in such an activity. Firstly, it would promote
an awareness of endocrinology within the general public, and secondly
help support the notion that Australian endocrinology is a strong
active research and clinical discipline here in Australia. This
is important in the funding stakes. There are many other advantages.
Conference Media
Australia (CMA) were appointed to run the campaign, and a subcommittee
of myself, Rebecca Mason and Chris Cowell was formed and together
with CMA identified newsworthy articles for press release, just
two per day. We also selected about a third of the stories from
Australian researchers - David Torpy, Phil Owens and Ken Ho were
chosen. Each chosen person was briefed on their role, they gave
their consent and participated in the process. Our committee was
on hand during the conference to assist journalists. One interesting
comment from the journalists was how difficult the abstracts were
to understand. I think this reflects the scientific content of the
abstracts compared with other medical conferences.
We achieved
an extremely high level of quality media coverage. The results in
cold hard terms have not been fully docu-mented, as articles are
still appearing in GP media like the Australian Doctor and Medical
Observer, and will continue to do so into March or later next year.
However, as of late November we had 20 television news and current
affairs stories, 53 newspaper stories, 62 radio news and talk-back
items, and 32 online news stories. A total of 167 separate items
of news coverage.
A valuable lesson
learned from dealing with the media is that very little happens
by chance. Almost all news appears to be orchestrated by someone,
some-where, who has a vested interest in what we read, watch and
hear.
One thing that really surprised me was the media's overwhelming
demand in response to each day's media stories. Many journalists
were assigned to be on site for the duration of the meeting, and
they sourced more stories than we had profiled for release. CMA
could easily have had other presenters solidly engaged in providing
media interviews over the entire course of the day, at the exclusion
of all else, and still not met total demand.
A suggestion
and question! Should we do this again at our own meetings? We could
defray the cost by including all the endocrine societies that meet
with us, and call it National Hormone Week or some such gimmicky
thing. It is something for all members and the new ESA Council to
consider. I certainly would support it. Can I suggest you feed back
your views to Council on this? Remember - it is our Society so have
you say.
Ray Rodgers
<<Table
of Contents - ESA Newsletter December 2000
|